We recently were consulted by a couple who had purchased three residential lots with lake frontage.  They intended to build a home that straddles all three lots, so clear title to all three is critical to their plans.

Unfortunately, when they went to the bank for a loan on the properties to build their dream home, they learned that title to two of the lots is impaired.

Before buying the two lots, they had the title checked, and they thought the attorney wrote to them with a title opinion on both.  As they checked their paperwork, they did have one title opinion letter, but it recited neither of the lots in question, but rather a lot they had sold.  

Thus, they were ready to start construction of their home, but were “stuck” either with bad title, or waiting for the title to be cleared.

How could this situation have been avoided?

  • First, they could have purchased an owners’ policy of title insurance;
  • Second they could have read the policy — to make sure it covered the right property and that it did not have unacceptable “exceptions” to coverage (that topic is addressed in this blog entry); and
  • Third, they could have dealt with experienced real estate attorneys from the outset.

This firm worked to assure that the attorney handling the closing will in fact “stand behind” his deficient legal work, but with proper legal work or title insurance coverage in place, they could be proceeding to build their dream house music sooner.

We discuss here the power of a lis pendens action, which is the combination of a law suit to force a seller to perform combined with a public notice to all prospective purchasers and mortgage lenders that the buyer in the litigation has a claim to the title to the real estate.

In addition to litigation — which always runs the risk of becoming expensive, there is another tool available under Ohio law that should have the effect of preventing a seller from conveying title to a second buyer or mortgage lender free from claims of the buyer number 1: An Affidavit of facts relating to title.

Ohio Revised Code Section 5301.252 sets forth the requirements for an Affidavit of Facts Relating to Title.  Essentially, one includes the legal description of the disputed land, and then  recites the name of the owner and the recording reference for his deed, along with the facts underlying the buyer’s claim.  So, if a buyer has a contract to buy real estate that the seller is breaching, one attaches that contract to the Affidavit, recites that pursuant to that Contract the buyer has the right to buy the subject property and places that claim of record.

A subsequent buyer “should” not buy the land, as long as his title examiner catches the claim (which he should).  (We have seen circumstances where subsequent buyers blow past these claims.)

Thus, the seller of real property is placed in the position of needing to address the buyers’ claims before he can sell the property to another, or mortgage the property.

An Affidavit of Facts Relating to Title can be a powerful tool to force sellers to deal with a title claim from a buyer whom he would rather ignore.

 

For five years, the issue has been percolating through the Ohio Department of Taxation and the Courts: When Cincinnati leased its municipal golf courses to Billy Casper Golf Management, did their real property become taxable?

The State Tax Commissioner said the property did become taxable.  The Board of Tax Appeals disagreed, and the Ohio Supreme Court unanimously agreed with the City of Cincinnati last week that the privatization agreement did not render the property taxable.

Court News of Ohio has the story here.

The decision, Joseph P. Testa, Tax Commissioner of Ohio v. City of Cincinnati, is here.

In contracts, leases, loan documents and other agreements, we frequently see a request that one party indemnify the other against certain occurrences.

As a simple and general proposition, indemnity provisions are ill-advised for the indemnitor.  They are open-ended access to one’s checkbook for all sorts of claims, and are usually accompanied by a duty to defend against those claims (i.e., pay for an attorney to defend a suit), whether meritorious or frivolous.  Thus, a short indemnity paragraph could lead to hundreds of thousands or millions of dollars of unexpected and unintended liability.  As a rule: Not a good idea.

Taking this concept over into the world of real estate sales, as is explained in this blog entry, Real Estate 101: Types of Deeds in Ohio, when a seller executes and delivers a warranty deed in Ohio (General Warranty Deed or Limited Warranty Deed), he is essentially providing an open-ended indemnification to a buyer of that property — and his successors down the chain of title — against certain title claims.  Among other things, a warranty covenant is a promise to defend against certain claims to the title from a third party.

Ohio Courts have ruled that the failure to provide that defense will mean the grantor must pay the attorneys fees of the grantee to so defend the title.  Hollon v. Abner, 1997 WL 602968 (Ohio App. 1 Dist., 1997).

Thus, although it is “standard operating procedure” in real estate transactions to provide a warranty deed, sellers may want to re-think that (starting with the signing of the contract as that instrument dictates what form of deed is required at the closing) and understand their open-ended exposure from a warranty deed.

Yesterday, I received an email from an attorney who was retiring after 31 years in the practice of law.  He shared some words that I thought wise, and I asked him if it was OK to share.  He graciously consented.  Here is part of his email:

Finally, I want to take a moment to say a few things that I think are important.  Retiring from a profession creates a new perspective. Thirty years of practice gives me the right to put a few things on paper.  Read on if you wish.

The practice of law has given me the opportunity to help solve problems for others.  Helping others overcome a hurdle or reach a new achievement has given me immense satisfaction.  Sadly, lawyers have become the punch line to a bad joke in too many people’s experience.  For many lawyers, the pressure to make more money has forced choices that have harmed the reputation of a once noble profession. Yet, many of us continue to seek the higher plane where the client comes first and the satisfaction is in a job well done, rather than the amount of the fee. I have known so many great people in my career who have given of themselves again and again to fulfill the needs of others. Being a lawyer can be so very rewarding.  For some it is measured only in the paycheck.  For many it is measured in the satisfaction felt when the clients’ needs are met….

Lastly, the practice of law has opened me to so many great people and opportunities.  I look back now and see your faces flashing before me.  Meetings, closings, council meetings, lunches, strategy sessions, board meetings.  Sharing more than just work; sharing our lives.  And for that I say – thanks for sharing.  It was truly my pleasure.

I thank him for his years of service and professionalism.  I enjoyed my brief interactions with him, and appreciated his wisdom as he moved on to other ventures in life.

I wish him the best.

The U.S. Supreme Court today ruled that Maryland’s scheme of property taxation because it does not provide a full tax credit to residents for money earned outside the state.

We are presently analyzing this decision for application to our Ohio and Kentucky clients.

A Washington Post article on t he topic is here.

The decision, Comptroller of the Treasury of Maryland  v. Wynne, et Ux., is here.

We have a 3-part blog series on some fundamentals of protecting personal assets when using a corporate form.  We recommend these for every small business owner and manager.

Pillars of Strength: Formatting a corporate signature to protect the “corporate veil.”

Pillars of Strength: Three tips for protecting your personal assets when forming and operating a company

Pillars of Strength: Effectively using your corporate form for limited liability protection

Contact Isaac Heintz ([513] 943-6654) for help with forming or growing your small business.

There are different types of deeds used in Ohio real estate transactions, providing buyers with differing levels of assurance of title quality from the seller and differing levels of liability, and potentially continuing liability, for the seller.

In Ohio, a seller can use a deed with specific language of conveyance either on a form pre-printed by a publishing house, or one crafted by his attorney. We refer to this as a “long form” of deed. In the case of a long-form of deed, because the language can differ from deed to deed, it is important to read the language of the deed, not just the title, to ascertain the warranties that accompany the deed. Also available in Ohio are statory “short forms” of deed (Ohio Revised Code Chapter 5302), which, if they use certain “magic words” as defined by statute, have the specific meanings ascribed to them in the statute (thus allowing for very short deeds and avoiding costly court battles about the meaning of deed language).

In Kentucky and Indiana, only long forms of deeds are available, meaning that reading the specific language of each deed is important.

Quit Claim Deed. A quit claim deed is just like it sounds – a grantor surrenders his claim to title to the grantee, whatever that quality of title may be.  Indeed, a seller can convey by quit claim deed even if he does not have title to the subject property.  Because the buyer is getting no assurance of title with such a deed, a quit claim deed is unusual in an arms length transaction. Quit claim deeds are frequently used to clear up title problems, where someone with a stray land interest can extinguish it by “quit claiming” to the otherwise rightful owner.

We have seen quit claim deeds used in commercial transactions. When used hand-in hand with an owner’s policy of title insurance, it can be acceptable for a buyer to have assurance of the quality of title. Essentially the title insurance underwriter takes the risk of title problems instead of the seller. There is a statutory form of quit claim deed in O.R.C. Section 5302.11.

Limited Warranty Deed (sometimes called Special Warranty Deed). A limited warranty deed, also sometimes known as a special warranty deed, is one in which the grantor warrants title to the grantee against encumbrances made by the grantor for those grantees claiming through the chain of title created by the grantor.

Thus, the grantor is not warrantying that he has good title, just that he has not impaired title during his ownership.  Again, if accepting such title, a buyer should have title insurance.

There is a statutory form in Ohio that provides that as long as the magic words “grants…with limited warranty covenants” are used, the scope of the deed is as set forth in O.R.C. Section 5202.07. Limited warranty covenants do survive through the chain of title, so a grantor could be responsible decades after a conveyance, to a subsequent grantee in the chain of title, for title defects.

General Warranty Deed. A general warranty deed is a broad promise from the grantor to the grantee that the grantor was the owner of the property, that the property is free from all encumbrances (except those excepted in the deed), that the grantor has the authority to convey the property, and that the grantor will defend against all claims from all persons. This is the most common form of deed for transactions in Ohio, Kentucky and Indiana, residential and commercial.

Sellers should be aware of the broad and perpetual liability they assume under a general warranty deed – to correct title problems and to pay an attorney to argue those issues for the buyer – with such a deed.  Sellers who would resist signing an indemnity provision in a contract or lease, frequently sign warranty deeds without any thought to their resulting continuing liability.

Similar to the Limited Warranty Deed, there is a statutory form for a general warranty deed in Ohio that provides that as long as the magic words “grants…with general warranty covenants” are used, the scope of the deed is as set forth in O.R.C. Section 5202.05.  Also, general warranty covenants do survive through the chain of title, so a grantor could be responsible decades after a conveyance, to a subsequent grantee in the chain of title, for title defects.

Fiduciary Deed. These deeds are most frequently used when the seller is acting in a fiduciary capacity, such as the executor or administrator of an estate or the trustee of a trust.   In the long form of a deed, the warranty covenants must be fleshed out (i.e., it is language specific to that deed), but the Ohio statutory short forms (O.R.C. Section 5302.09 and 5302.10) provide that fiduciary covenants cover only the authority of the fiduciary to convey (i.e., that he is duly appointed, qualified and acting within the scope of his appointed authority and authorized to make the sale in such capacity).  A statutory short form of fiduciary deed is otherwise a quit claim deed, and as should be used only in conjunction with a title insurance policy issued to the grantee.

For both buyers and sellers, careful consideration should be given to the type of deed called for in the contract and used at the closing, as it will affect their rights and responsibilities when a title problem arises.  This also impacts the circumstances under which it is more compelling for a buyer to obtain an owner’s policy of title insurance at the closing.

The City of Cleveland assessed against professional athletes its municipal income tax using the “games played” method of taxation.

Under this calculation, the municipality took the athlete’s total annual compensation, times the municipal rate of taxation divided by the number of pre-season and regular games in the professional season for a per-game tax amount.  That number was then multiplied by the number of games the player played in the City each year.

Former Chicago Bears linebacker Hunter T. Hillenmeyer challenged that method of taxation for calendar years 2004, 2005 and 2006, in which he played one game each in the City of Cleveland.  In each of those years, he spent a total of two days in the City of Cleveland, but they tried to tax him 5% of his total earningson the basis of a 20-game season.

The Ohio Supreme Court sided with Hillenmeyer in finding that Cleveland’s “Games Played” method of calculating the taxes due violated his due process rights.

The decision is here.